How can you convince someone not to accept but to at least consider a philosophical claim proposed with proper logical and rational evidence, when one rejects your opinion without for once thinking of the idea presented? By saying, “You’re too young to understand” “It’s normal for children of your age to make such absurd claims” “Please stop, like you can change the world” “It’s alright you will mature with time” “The world does not work the way you think” Though I know that some of my claims may be subjected to such biases of my state of maturity. I am not perfect, yes I agree with it. But is it required for others to completely shut me up into such solitude of disacceptance? Not thinking if the idea by any chance is correct or incorrect. And why is it that people mostly judge others through their physical characteristics, even when they know that it’s wrong?
Catholicism is fabricated mainly around the sacred sacrifice of Christ. The O’holy saviour. The religion and its doctrine, though evolved through the ages- by newer creeds and other updates- still follow the initial cause. The worship of the all mighty triad, the holy trinity. As a custom to the last supper, implemented by Jesus. And to this day, in remembrance of the supper held two millennia ago...
Most people collect and gather objects for their material and monetary value. But with time some of those lose partially the value attribute. Meaning it will someday be deprived of all its objectivity, other than the material and sentimental value. As we humans are often applying a sentimental value to most of the objects we interact with while appreciating objects with functionality and a pleasur...
Essays · Poems · Stories
Movies · TV Series
Anime · Manga · Light Novels